![spyware audacity spyware audacity](https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/audacity-lede-2.png)
![spyware audacity spyware audacity](https://techunwrapped.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Audacity-Accused-of-Collecting-User-Data-to-Make-Spyware-780x470.jpg)
"We do not collect any additional data beyond the points listed above for any purpose," said Ray. Users can also manually send data in error reports, but this is optional. Ray's GitHub post also clarified that the only data Audacity collects is users' IP address, which is anonymised and becomes irretrievable after 24 hours, as well as their operating system version and CPU type. "This means that we will actually deny a law enforcement request unless there is a court order, not that we are actively sharing data with law enforcement," Ray said. He further stated that Audacity would not share any information to law enforcement upon mere request, and would have to be compelled by a court of law to do so. "e share data with buyers of the company (there are no buyers of the data since we never sell any data), but any buyer can only use this data for the conditions set out in the privacy policy," Ray told Mashable.
![spyware audacity spyware audacity](https://i2.wp.com/9to5mac.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2021/07/IMG_0463.jpeg)
Speaking to Mashable via email, Ray clarified that Audacity will in fact share data with third parties, but only in specific circumstances. Full stop." However, this seemed to directly contradict the privacy policy's initial statement that it may disclose personal data to "a potential buyer" or "any competent law enforcement body. "We will be publishing a revised version shortly."Īccording to Ray, Audacity " not and will not sell ANY data collect or share it with 3rd parties. Muse Group acquired Audacity in May, and had assured users at the time that the software would remain free and open source. "We believe concerns are due largely to unclear phrasing in the Privacy Policy, which we are now in the process of rectifying," said Muse Group's head of strategy Daniel Ray in a statement on GitHub. Now Audacity has attempted to clarify its intentions. Users have been vocally expressing their displeasure at these updates, accusing Audacity of being "spyware" and speculating that it could monitor their microphones. Data may also be shared with third parties such as law enforcement agencies, advisors, and potential buyers.
![spyware audacity spyware audacity](https://thehack.com.br/content/images/2021/07/audacity.png)
The new privacy policy also states that Audacity may collect "Data necessary for law enforcement, litigation and authorities’ requests (if any)" - a categorisation vague and large enough to cause users significant concern. All of this came as a rude shock to users, who had been utilising the free audio editing software without giving up data since its launch over two decades ago. Such data includes their operating system and its version, their IP address (thus their country), and their CPU. On July 2, Audacity updated its privacy policy to state that it will now collect users' "personal data" for analytics and to improve their software. The privacy aspect was just an unexpected bonus, it turns out.Popular audio editing program Audacity is trying to clear up recent accusations that it's now "spyware" after recent changes to its privacy policy. I set the wiping before anyone even considered IP addresses personal information from a legal standpoint purely due to disk space issues over a decade ago. We technically collect "personal" information in the form of IP addresses (mostly only the EU considers it personal) for the standard Apache logs, though we don't save the logs permanently and it's entirely deleted every few days. Side Note: In a similar fashion, our privacy policy for is written more broadly than is necessary as that was the standard way to do it when I had written it using online guides. It seems that may be the case and we'll see how they adjust the policy over the coming days: As there was no accompanying release with the July 2 change in privacy policy, I was thinking that it was being written overly broad for a specific situation.